图片激情文学网

期刊简介

图片

《国外政事经济学议论》(Review of International Political Economy)是一份涵盖国外政事经济学参谋的双月刊同业评审学术期刊。其确立于1999年，由Routledge出书。本刊是国外政事经济学规模的主流期刊之一，与《新政事经济学》(New Political Economy)并排。2022年该刊影响因子为4.3。

本期目次

01

社会环境滋扰与地皮管理：中国在阿根廷基础门径投资参谋

Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina

02

“非矜重”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制夹杂性

Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state

03

主权危险金融中的国外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的比拟

International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures

04

核不扩散轨制复合体系的不彊壮性

The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex

05

管理收集空间：跨组织的战略领域的政事

Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations

06

竞争与轨制的复杂架构：国外造就中的泰斗关系与分化

Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education

07

国外轨制复合体的等第与分化：比拟参谋的表面框架

Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research

08

国外轨制复合体中的价值分化、战略变化与合作

Value differentiation， policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes

本期选录

社会环境滋扰与地皮管理：中国在阿根廷基础培育投资参谋

题目：Socio-environmental conflicts and land governance: a study of Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina

作家：Sol Mora，圣马丁国立大学政事与政府学院阿根廷国度科学工夫参谋委员会 (CONICET) 的博士后参谋员。

选录：本文通过分析地皮管理——非凡是通过中国基础门径投资在阿根廷试图实施的地皮赢得，在新葛兰西主见方法和拉丁好意思洲政事生态学之间建立了对话。在这两种不雅点之间架起桥梁，将罗伯特·考克斯的框架应用于地皮管理固有的社会和环境滋扰的参谋。对阿根廷的两个地皮赢得策画的参谋，其中一个被暂停，一个修改后不时进行，标明社会按捺不错制约通过投资至极现实进行地皮限度的尝试。因此，这两种表面不雅点之间的对话不仅使考克斯的念念想容许活力，而且将环境和当然管理经由中的社会环境滋扰动作IPE的新参谋标的。

This article establishes a dialogue between the neo-Gramscian approach and Latin American Political Ecology by analyzing land governance – specifically attempts at land grabbing through Chinese infrastructure investments in Argentina. Building bridges between these two perspectives enables an application of Robert Cox’s framework to the study of socio-environmental conflicts inherent to land governance. The study of two land grabbing initiatives in Argentina， one that was suspended and one that continues with modifications， shows that social resistance can condition attempts at land control through investments and their execution. Consequently， the dialogue between these two theoretical perspectives not only revitalizes Cox’s thought but also highlights socio-environmental conflicts in environmental and nature governance processes as a new research direction for IPE.

“非矜重”住房问题的政事经济学：后殖民国度的轨制夹杂性

AV解说

题目：Political economy of the 'informal’ housing question: institutional-hybridity of the postcolonial state

作家：Danish Khan，好意思国富兰克林与马歇尔学院经济系助理教化兼“不对等、勤劳、职权和社会正义倡议”连合主任。

选录：连年来，国外政事经济学（IPE）学者越来越热心城市问题。然则，他们主要热心的是特定的少数几个全球“城市”在退换成本、商品和工作的全球流动中的脚色。尽管如斯，IPE文件中存在一个繁难的空缺在于对新解放主见全球化进度若何影响和设施位于全球南边城市的低收入“非矜重”住房部门的探索有限。为了弥补现存IPE文件中的这一空缺，本文在新解放主见辘集轨制的布景下，对非正规住房假寓点的变成和撤销经由进行了批判性分析。非正规住房假寓点依然得到了批判性地地舆学家和城市参谋规模学者的平凡参谋。本文卓尔不群之处在于对IPE文件方面作念出了私有的孝顺，即运用非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学动作批判性分析社会骨子论和后殖民国度内在矛盾的切入点。本文以为，通过“轨制夹杂性”的视角不错更好地清醒非正规住房假寓点与后殖民国度之间的关系。这个主张指的是后殖民国度内矛盾的社会经济和轨制刺激的会通，旨在同期管理社会再分娩和成本主见辘集。社会再分娩和辘集之间固有的张力在非正规住房假寓点中以“仁慈-暴力”的辩证法体式阐明出来。一方面，后殖民国度试图通过多档次的职权收集“允许”边际化群体建立非正规住房假寓点，以阐明出“仁慈”的形象。另一方面，一朝边际化群体滋扰了房地产主导的成本主见辘集，后殖民国度将继承暴力技巧终结他们。因此，本文以为，IPE学者应仔细研究非正规住房假寓点的政事经济学，因为它提供了关联后殖民国度若何受到调控并被不同的新解放主见全球化社会经济力量拉扯的机制的真切见地。

In recent years， International Political Economy (IPE) scholars have increasingly turned their attention to cities. However， their primary focus has been on the role of a select few global 'cities’ that regulate global flows of capital， goods， and services. Nonetheless， a significant gap in the IPE literature pertains to the limited exploration of how processes of neoliberal globalization are impacting and regulating the low-income 'informal’ housing sector in cities located in the global South. To address this gap in the existing IPE literature， this paper critically analyzes the processes of formation and demolition of informal housing settlements against the backdrop of the neoliberal regime of accumulation. Informal housing settlements have been extensively examined by critical geographers and scholars in the field of urban studies. What distinguishes this paper is its unique contribution to the literature on IPE， that is， it utilizes the political economy of informal housing settlements as an entry point to critically analyze social ontology and the inherent contradictions of the postcolonial state. The paper argues that the relationship between informal housing settlements and the postcolonial state can be better understood through the lens of the 'institutional hybridity.’ This concept refers to the fusion of contradictory socio-economic and institutional impulses within the postcolonial state， which aims to manage social reproduction and capitalist accumulation simultaneously. The inherent tension between social reproduction and accumulation manifests in the informal housing settlements in the form of a dialectic of 'benevolence-violence.’ On one hand， the postcolonial state attempts to appear 'benevolent’ towards marginalized groups by 'allowing’ them to establish informal housing settlements through a multi-layered network of clientelism. On the other hand， the postcolonial state resorts to violent displacement of marginalized groups as soon as they pose obstacles to real estate-led capitalist accumulation. Thus， the paper contends that IPE scholars should carefully consider the political economy of informal housing settlements， as it provides captivating insights into the mechanisms through which the postcolonial state becomes subject to regulation and is pulled in different directions by the socio-economic forces of neoliberal globalization.

主权危险金融中的国外轨制的复杂性：区域架构的比拟

题目：International regime complexity in sovereign crisis finance: a comparison of regional architectures

作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学国外工作学院国外经济关系教化。

选录：国外轨制复杂性表面框定了国外合作的预期，这种预期源自不同机构体系中等第和各别化组合。本文比拟了2000年至2019年时代，东亚、拉丁好意思洲和欧元区危险金融区域复杂体系中地区金融安排与国外货币基金组织之间的关系，并对窥察了这些预期。动作全球和地区机构之间的错杂国度，债权国在采选这些复杂体系的架构（等第和各别化的组合）方面尤其具有影响力，但受到前几十年所接受的安排的限定。一朝采选了复杂体系的架构，它反过来将影响借款国的战略颐养和国度在不舒畅机构时是追求轨制升沉如故建立竞争性轨制。这些发现总体上合适预期，但超出了核样式论对欧元区战略颐养的预期程度。机构间的合作动态填补了这一解释差距。本文的论断是，机构之间的关系关于清醒轨制复杂体系的终端和演变至关繁难，何况比单一轨制主见、职权差距假说和其他替代方法提供的解释更无缺。

The theory of international regime complexity that frames this study specifies expectations for international cooperation stemming from different combinations of hierarchy and differentiation among institutions in regime complexes. This paper compares relationships between regional financial arrangements and the International Monetary Fund in the regional complexes for crisis finance in East Asia， Latin America，婷婷第四色 and the euro area during 2000-2019 and tests these expectations. Creditor states that sit at the nexus between global and regional institutions are particularly influential in the choice of architecture (the combination of hierarchy and differentiation) for these complexes but are constrained by arrangements inherited from previous decades. Once chosen， the complex’s architecture in turn shapes policy adjustment in borrowing countries and influences whether states pursue regime shifting or competitive regime creation when dissatisfied with institutions. These findings generally coincide with expectations， but exceed the degree of policy adjustment that the core theory expected for the euro area. Interinstitutional collaboration， the dynamics of which are elaborated， fills this explanatory gap. The paper concludes that relations among institutions are essential for understanding the outcomes and evolution of regime complexes and underpin a more complete explanation than provided by singular institutionalism， the power-gap hypothesis and other alternative approaches.

核不扩散轨制复合体系的不彊壮性

题目：The instability of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex

作家：Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni，剑桥大学政事与国外参谋系国外组织和全球政事学教化

选录：本文对核不扩散轨制复合体系的轨制架构中旅途依赖性的变化进行了表面分析，并分析了不同轨制复合结构对机构竞争和战略颐养的影响。最先，我建议了一个一般性表面，请问了国外轨制复合体系（IRCs）的先有的轨制结构若何以一种使IRC易于内生旅途依赖性变化的口头促进和限定随后的轨制发展。接下来，我请问了在核不扩散复合体系中，轨制升沉和竞争性轨制建立策略若何激发了旅途依赖性的“响应序列”，导致轨制分裂日益加重。为了明白IRC演变的内生能源，我在三个“要道时刻”注目了核不扩散复合体系：20世纪70年代中期、冷战已毕时期和21世纪初。在每个时期，外生的扩散冲击与现存的机构结构相互作用，产生了特定的竞争模式，从而激发了日益加重的轨制分裂的响应序列。我的论点关于全球经济管理具有平凡的适用性，并对不休增长的国外政事经济学文件探讨全球管理机构中的响应序列和轨制退让具有繁难道理。

This article theorizes path-dependent changes in the institutional architecture of the nuclear nonproliferation regime complex; it analyses the effects of different regime-complex structures on institutional contestation and policy adjustment. I first offer a general theory of how the preexisting institutional structures of international regime complexes (IRCs) facilitate and constrain subsequent institutional developments in ways that make IRCs prone to endogenous， path-dependent change. Next， I illustrate how strategies of regime shifting and rival regime creation in the nuclear nonproliferation complex have triggered path-dependent 'reactive sequencing’， resulting in growing institutional fragmentation. To illustrate endogenous dynamics of IRC evolution， I examine the nuclear nonproliferation complex at three 'critical junctures’: The mid-1970s， the end of the Cold War， and the early-2000s. During each period， exogenous proliferation shocks interacted with pre-existing institutional structures to produce specific patterns of contestation which set in motion a reactive sequence of growing institutional fragmentation. My argument has relevance for global economic governance broadly and for the growing IPE literature which explores reactive sequencing and institutional decay in global governance institutions.

管理收集空间：跨组织的战略领域的政事

题目：Governing cyberspace: policy boundary politics across organizations

作家：Stephanie C. Hofmann，欧洲大学参谋所政事与社会科学系教化和罗伯特·舒曼高等参谋中心国外关系连合主席；Patryk Pawlak，卡内基欧洲参谋中心的拜谒学者和欧洲大学参谋所（佛罗伦萨）罗伯特·舒曼高等参谋中心兼职教化。

选录：战略领域和问题相互依存并非是既定的。它们所触及的横蛮关系——由谁管理、若何管理以及战略规模在哪里——跟着时刻的推移被轨制化，这平方是由全球朔方国度最先制定。咱们对这些横蛮关系如安在组织里面和跨组织轨制化的口头知之甚少。为此，咱们通过探究一个新兴战略规模如安在一个高度轨制化的环境中，色姐姐综合若何和取得什么后果来填补这个空缺。咱们以为，新战略规模，如收集空间或东谈主工智能，促使政府转念资源通过将远景性的问题团聚在新组织和现存组织中进行择地采选战略框架，以培育定约合作。当先，志同谈合的国度在组织中更有可能产生共识，从而导致部分各别化的非等第轨制复合体。恒久而言，竞争性的压力颐养，尤其南半球国度所感受到的压力，有助于激发轨制向一个谐和的一般性组织的轨制革新。要道的行径者必须再行颐养他们的框架，从而减少各别。在现在的地缘政事天下中，这加重了组织里面政事不合。咱们在收集空间的案例中窥察了三个命题，并展示了跨组织竞争框架的扩散若何导致战略狡辩升沉到连合国，而在连合国只可进行破裂的战略颐养。咱们的分析基于一手贵寓和千里浸式策略。

Policy boundaries and issue interdependence are not a given. The stakes they imply—who governs， how， and where a policy domain is—become institutionalized over time， often first by the Global North. We know little about how these stakes are presented and institutionalized within and across organizations. We tackle this lacuna by asking how， and to what effect， an emerging policy domain is situated in a densely institutionalized environment. We argue that new policy domains such as cyberspace or artificial intelligence prompt resourceful governments to forum-shop policy frames by clustering promising issues in new and existing organizations in pursuit of coalition-building. Initially， resonance is more likely to be established in organizations with like-minded countries， leading to partially differentiated non-hierarchical regime complexes. In the long-term， competing adjustment pressures， particularly felt in the Global South， help trigger a regime-shift to an orchestrating general-purpose organization. Key actors must reconfigure their frames thereby reducing differentiation. In today’s geopolitical world， this hardens intra-organizational political differences. We examine three propositions in the case of cyberspace and show how the proliferation of competing frames across organizations led to shifting the policy debate to the UN， where only piecemeal policy adjustments are possible. Our analysis is based on primary sources and immersion strategies.

与轨制的复杂架构：国外造就中的泰斗关系与分化

题目：Competition and regime complex architecture: authority relations and differentiation in international education

作家：Rie Kijima，多伦多大学蒙克全球事务与人人战略学院的助理教化；Phillip Y. Lipscy，多伦多大学政事学系和蒙克全球事务与人人战略学院教化，及东京大学法学院教化。

选录：轨制复杂性的决定成分和后果是什么？咱们以为，国外议题规模的特征——收集效应和干预壁垒——影响了可行竞争的程度，并对泰斗关系、轨制各别化和实质性终端产生了繁难影响。竞争倾向于侵蚀现存轨制的主导地位，松开等第轨制。竞争下的各别化因职权和物资资源而异：弘大的国度试图通过引入无各别化的机构来调动近况，而资源有限的行径者则倾向于针对各别化的利基市集。实质性终端的各别取决于驱动的轨制竖立，非凡是在当先被赋予职权的行径者更可能从竞争中失利。咱们通过参谋国外造就轨制复杂体系（这是一个具有极其繁难性但平方被疏远的议题规模）来发展这个表面并测试四个假定。

What are the determinants and consequences of regime complexity? We argue that characteristics of international issue areas – network effects and entry barriers – affect the degree of feasible competition， with important consequences for authority relations， institutional differentiation， and substantive outcomes. Competition tends to erode the dominance of status quo institutions， diminishing hierarchy. Differentiation under competition varies according to power and material resources: Powerful states seek to shift the status quo by introducing undifferentiated institutions， while actors with limited resources tend to target differentiated niches. Variation in substantive outcomes depends on the initial configuration of institutions， particularly which actors are originally empowered and thus stand to lose from competition. We develop this theory and test four hypotheses by examining the regime complex for international education， a substantively important but often neglected issue area.

国外轨制复合体的等第与分化：比拟参谋的表面框架

题目：Hierarchy and differentiation in international regime complexes: a theoretical framework for comparative research

作家：C. Randall Henning，好意思利坚大学国外工作学院国外经济关系教化；Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理教化。

选录：国外轨制复杂性的主张提供了一个灵验的视角来参谋全球管理中国外机构的不休增多。越来越多的国外政事经济学（IPE）文件指出，好多繁难战略规模存在重迭的机构集群，然则一些学者以为，复杂性松开了管理遵守，而另一些学者则以为漫衍的机构优于归并的机构。为了使这些发现具有连贯性，咱们建议了一个一般的表面框架，基于两个结构特征来刻画轨制复杂性：泰斗关系和机构分化。这些维度共同决定了国度和其他行径者在遵命轨制限定时所靠近的机遇和限定。因此，它们塑造了繁难的终端，举例战略颐养、轨制升沉和创建竞争性轨制。本文建议了关联泰斗和分化效应的可窥察假定，并评估它们与本专题的五篇同伴著述所参谋的八个轨制复杂体的对应关系。咱们进一步笃定了一组塑造轨制复杂体随时刻演变的动态经由。咱们的框架加强了轨制复杂体的比拟分析基础，并为参谋策画提供了新的议程。

The concept of international regime complexity offers a useful lens for examining the increasing density of international institutions in global governance. A growing literature in International Political Economy (IPE) identifies clusters of overlapping institutions in many important policy areas， yet some scholars argue that complexity undermines governance effectiveness， while others perceive distinct advantages over unified institutions. To bring coherence to these findings， we present a general theoretical framework that characterizes regime complexes based on two structural features: Authority relations and institutional differentiation. These dimensions jointly determine the opportunities and constraints that states and other actors confront as they navigate institutional rules. As a result， they shape important outcomes， such as policy adjustment， regime shifting and competitive regime creation. The article proposes testable hypotheses regarding the effects of authority and differentiation， and we assess their correspondence with the eight regime complexes examined by the five companion articles in this special issue. We further identify a set of dynamic processes that shape the evolution of regime complexes over time. Our framework strengthens the foundation for comparative analysis of regime complexes and charts a new agenda for the research program.

国外轨制复合体中的价值分化、战略变化与合作

题目：Value differentiation， policy change and cooperation in international regime complexes

作家：Tyler Pratt，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校政事学助理教化。

选录：在国外政事经济学(IPE)的好多议题规模中，国度间的合作受到密集的、不同但重迭的国外机构收集的管理。这种“轨制复杂性”环境是增强如故松开合作一直备受争议。有东谈主以为，重迭的机构增强了正当性和纯真性，而其他东谈主则以为，契机主见的择地采选使得国度粗略秘籍顺从严格的限定。本文融合了这个争论，解说轨制复杂性会根据轨制之间的价值各别程度产生不同的影响。在那些不具各别化机构动作替代品的议题规模中，择地采选会缩小轨制料理国度步履的智商。然则，在那些轨制机构通过价值永别的问题规模中，即即跟着限定变得愈加严格，它们提供的克己也会加多，机构重迭不错促使国度战略变革。本文推崇了这一动态变化，并在对选举不雅察和与丛林联系的碳赔偿的政权复合体进行比拟分析时提供了请示凭证。

In many issue areas in international political economy (IPE)， interstate cooperation is governed by a dense network of distinct but overlapping international institutions. Whether this environment of 'regime complexity’ strengthens or undermines cooperation is a subject of intense debate. Some argue that overlapping institutions enhance legitimacy and flexibility， while others claim that opportunistic forum shopping enables states to escape compliance with rigorous rules. This article reconciles this debate， demonstrating that regime complexity has contrasting effects depending on the degree of value differentiation among institutions. In issue areas where undifferentiated institutions function as substitutes， forum shopping will reduce the regime’s ability to discipline state behavior. However， in issue areas where institutions are differentiated by value – i.e. the benefits they provide increase as rules become more rigorous – institutional overlap can increase policy change among states. I demonstrate these dynamics formally and provide empirical evidence in a comparative analysis of the regime complexes for election observation and forest-related carbon offsets.

编译 | 朱嘉成 崔育涞

校对 | 崔育涞 朱嘉成

排版 | 赵弘宇

本文源于《国外政事经济学议论》，本文为公益共享，工作于科研教学，不代表本平台不雅点。如有大意，宽宥指正。

图片

本站仅提供存储工作，总共内容均由用户发布，如发现存害或侵权内容，请点击举报。